Mapping Global Research on Carbon Tax: A Bibliometric Analysis

Autor(s): Nabila Sukma Larasati, Caecilia Widi Pratiwi
DOI: 10.35760/ugefic.v8i1.175

Abstract

This study aims to analyze global research trends on carbon tax using bibliometric methods. A dataset of 500 international publications was collected and processed with VOSviewer to map keyword co-occurrence, citation networks, and thematic clusters. The results show that research on carbon tax has significantly increased over the past five years, with dominant topics including “carbon tax,” “carbon taxis,” “carbon emissions,” and “impact.” The bibliometric mapping identifies key authors, countries, and institutions contributing to the field, with research clusters focusing on economic implications, policy effectiveness, and sustainability transitions. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the academic landscape of carbon tax research and highlights potential directions for future studies, especially in developing countries.

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis, Carbon tax, Sustainability, VOSviewer

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andersson, J. J. (2019). Carbon taxes and CO₂ emissions: Sweden as a case study. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 1–30.

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bataille, C. (2020). Low and zero emissions in the steel and cement industries: Barriers, technologies and policies. Energy Policy, 141, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111418

Böhringer, C., Rivers, N., Rutherford, T. F., & Wigle, R. (2012). Green jobs and renewable electricity policies: Employment impacts of Ontario’s feed-in tariff. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 12(1), 1–54.

Chevallier, J. (2019). Carbon markets: Pricing, allocation, and policy. Energy Policy, 129, 536–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.011

Giannarakis, G., Zafeiriou, E., Arabatzis, G., Partalidou, X., & Tsourgiannis, L. (2017). Factors affecting energy consumption and CO₂ emissions: Evidence from Greece. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 11(4), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-04-2017-0009

Global Carbon Project. (2023). Global carbon budget 2023. Retrieved from https://www.globalcarbonproject.org

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lin, B., & Li, X. (2011). The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO₂ emissions. Energy Policy, 39(9), 5137–5146.

Metcalf, G. E. (2019). On the economics of a carbon tax for the United States. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2019(1), 405–458.

Metcalf, G. E., & Weisbach, D. (2009). The design of a carbon tax. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 33(2), 499–556.

Nordhaus, W. D. (2019). Climate change: The ultimate challenge for economics. American Economic Review, 109(6), 1991–2014.

OECD. (2021). Effective carbon rates 2021: Pricing carbon emissions through taxes and emissions trading. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan.

Shahzad, U., Fareed, Z., Shahzad, F., & Shahzad, K. (2021). Investigating the nexus between economic complexity, energy consumption and ecological footprint for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 103–113.

Stiglitz, J. E., & Stern, N. (2017). Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Tol, R. S. J. (2019). The economic impacts of climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(1), 1–25.

Wang, Q., Li, R., & Li, R. (2021). Has carbon emissions trading reduced CO₂ emissions? Evidence from the EU ETS. Energy Economics, 102, 105472.

World Bank. (2020). State and trends of carbon pricing 2020. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Zhang, Z. (2015). Carbon emissions trading in China: The evolution from pilots to a nationwide scheme. Climate Policy, 15(3), 451–463.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
error code: 522